Liz Kendall says Waspi women gained’t get compensation no matter ombudsman saying they should – UK politics dwell | Politics

Keir Starmer has talked about he accepts that Waspi women will most likely be unhappy with the federal authorities’s option to not pay them compensation.

In an interview with broadcasters in Estonia, requested if he understood the anger of those affected, Starmer replied:

I do understand their concerns. The ombudsman’s findings had been clear in relation to maladministration, however moreover clear regarding the lack of direct financial injustice, as a result of the ombudsman observed it. That’s why we’ve taken the selection that we’ve taken.

But I do understand, in reality, the precedence of the Waspi women.

But moreover I’ve to keep in mind whether or not or not it’s correct in the meanwhile to impose an additional burden on the taxpayer, which is what it could possibly be.

The last Conservative authorities didn’t give any indication that it was extra prone to accept the ombudsman’s solutions if it gained the election and, in her response to Liz Kendall, Helen Whately, the shadow work and pensions secretary, didn’t argue that the federal authorities must have taken one other alternative.

But she did say this was now Labour’s alternative, they normally wanted to “own it”. In the Commons she instructed MPs:

No doubt campaigners will observe the federal authorities’s apology for the alternatives made between 2005 and 2007 which led to a 28-month delay in sending out letters which the ombudsman acknowledged as maladministration nevertheless let’s be clear, the selection to produce no compensation is the federal authorities’s alternative and they need to private it.

I’m not going to permit them to get away with saying that that is because of a fictional black hole throughout the public funds. The nation’s financial place now’s a outcomes of their political selections.

They shouldn’t try to dodge responsibility by suggesting to waspi women that if cases had been completely completely different, they might have come to a singular conclusion.

Waspi, the Women Against State Pension Inequality advertising marketing campaign, has condemned the federal authorities’s alternative as “totally unjustified”. This is from its chair, Angela Madden.

The authorities has for the time being made an unprecedented political choice to ignore the clear solutions of an neutral watchdog which ordered ministers urgently to compensate Waspi women 9 months previously.

This is a bizarre and fully unjustified switch which may go away everyone asking what the aim of an ombudsman is that if ministers can merely ignore their alternatives. It seems like a name that will make the likes of Boris Johnson and Donald Trump blush.

The idea that an ‘action plan’ to avoid such errors in future must be the outcomes of a six-year ombudsman’s investigation is an insult every to the women and to the PHSO [Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman] course of.

An overwhelming majority of MPs once more Waspi’s requires truthful compensation and all decisions keep on the desk. Parliament ought to now search one other mechanism to energy this issue on to the order paper so justice could possibly be carried out.

Here are further quotes from Liz Kendall’s statement to MPs saying the federal authorities gained’t accept the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman’s recommendation on compensation for Waspi women.

• Kendall talked about the ombudsman’s report didn’t criticise the selection in 1995 to increase the state pension age for ladies, or the coalition’s alternative in 2011 to hurry up that improve. The report coated in its place complaints regarding the Department for Work and Pensions not accurately warning women regarding the improve, she talked about. Decisions made between 2005 and 2007 led to a 28-month delay in warning letters being despatched to women born throughout the Fifties. The report talked about that didn’t end result throughout the women struggling direct financial misplaced. But, Kendall instructed MPs, it was maladministration consistent with the report.

[The report] references evaluation from 2004 exhibiting 43% of women aged over 60 had been acutely aware of their state pension age. But it doesn’t sufficiently sufficiently recognise proof from the an identical evaluation that 73% of women aged 45 to 54 had been acutely aware that the state pension age was rising – the very group that covers women born throughout the Fifties. Or evaluation from 2006 that 90% of women aged 45 to 54 had been acutely aware that the state pension age was rising.

Research given to the ombudsman reveals solely spherical 1 / 4 of people that discover themselves despatched unsolicited letters actually keep in mind receiving them or finding out them. So we can’t accept that throughout the good majority of circumstances sending a letter earlier would have affected whether or not or not women knew their state pension age was rising or would have elevated their options to make educated alternatives.

These two particulars – that almost all women knew the state pension age was rising and that letters aren’t as very important as a result of the Ombudsman says – along with completely different causes have educated our conclusion that there must be no scheme of financial compensation to Fifties-born women in response to the ombudsman’s report.

• And she talked about paying a flat cost of compensation, as helpful by the ombudsman, wouldn’t be may be “a fair or proportionate use of taxpayers money”.

First, we have to work with the ombudsman to develop an in depth movement plan out of the report, so every and all courses are learnt.

Second, we’re devoted to setting clear and satisfactory uncover of any modifications throughout the state pension age so of us can accurately plan for his or her retirement.

And third, I’ve tasked officers to develop a method for environment friendly, effectively timed and classy communication on the state pension that makes use of the freshest methods.

In March the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman revealed a report saying that the so-called Waspi women (Women Against State Pension Inequality) deserved compensation because of they didn’t get sufficient warning from the federal authorities in regards to the fact that their state pension age was going up. It talked about of us affected must be paid compensation, and that this would possibly worth as a lot as £10.5bn.

At the time the Conservatives, who had been then in authorities, and Labour, who had been anticipating to modify them inside months, refused to resolve to accepting the recommendation. But the then authorities talked about it might take time to consider the report accurately, and Labour moreover delay a definitive response.

In a press launch to the Commons, Liz Kendall has now delivered the federal authorities’s formal response. And she has dominated out paying compensation.

She instructed MPs:

Given the overwhelming majority of women knew the state pension age was rising, the federal authorities doesn’t think about paying a flat cost to all women at a value of as a lot as £10.5bn could be a good or proportionate use of taxpayers money, not least when the sooner authorities didn’t put apart a single penny for any compensation scheme, and after they left us a £22bn throughout the public funds.

This has been an particularly powerful option to take, nevertheless we think about it’s the correct plan of motion, and we’re determined to review all of the teachings to ensure certainly one of these maladministration on no account happens as soon as extra.

Jonathan Reynolds, the enterprise secretary, has launched that the scope of the compensation programme for victims of the Post Office scandal will most likely be extended to cowl earlier potential victims.

The authorities already has four schemes in place offering compensation to place up officer operators who suffered because of faulty Horizon IT software program program led to them being wrongly blamed for missing money. More than 900 of us had been prosecuted, better than 100 had been jailed, nevertheless many further misplaced out because of they’d been compelled to repay money they’d been accused of shedding or stealing, and/or because of they misplaced their jobs.

The Horizon system was launched in 1999. But there have been suspicions that comparable flaws existed with the Capture IT accounting system utilized by the Post Office throughout the Nineties sooner than Horizon was rolled out. In September the federal authorities revealed a report by the consultants Kroll saying there was “a reasonable likelihood that Capture could have created shortfalls for subpostmasters”.

Today the Department for Business and Trade has revealed its reponse. It says it’s extending its compensation provide to keep in mind the Kroll conclusions. Several put up office operators raised points with Capture on the time, it says, but it surely certainly doesn’t put a decide on what number of people could also be eligible for compensation and it says a couple of of those affected could have died.

A serious time period has moreover handed, and we recognise that which implies that timescales are much better, and the inhabitants of postmasters that used Capture will most likely be further superior in age, or a greater proportion of the inhabitants may need sadly died. We moreover recognise that the passage of time signifies that proof of shortfalls and consequential losses, and proof concerning suspensions, termination, prosecution, or convictions, will most likely be far tougher to hunt out. It will subsequently be powerful for claimants to corroborate their claims with updated proof. Postmasters, the Post Office, or the UK authorities won’t have ample proof, and we would on no account uncover ample proof to seek out out obligation to the extent which may be anticipated by the courts.

In a news release, Reynolds says:

It is because of testimony of postmasters that this has been dropped at light and failings have been discovered.

We ought to now work shortly to produce redress and justice to people who have suffered considerably after being wrongly accused.

I’d want to encourage anyone who believes they’ve been affected by Capture to share their story with us so we’re in a position to put wrongs to correct as quickly as and for all.

Gareth Thomas, the Post Office minister, says that particulars of how compensation will most likely be paid to people who suffered due to flaws with Capture will most likely be labored over over the approaching months. He explains:

We are considering one of the best sort of redress for victims who’ve suffered.

This is a tough practice given the passage of time and the quite a few lack of knowledge and proof.

Our proposals will most likely be developed by way of partaking with postmasters and licensed representatives.

Over the approaching months, we have to resolve the scope of the financial redress and the eligibility requirements so that we’re in a position to ship closure to the impacted postmasters.

The first few victims of the contaminated blood scandal have acquired their final compensation pay outs, PA Media opinions. And eligibility requirements allowing siblings to get compensation have been extended. PA says:

Cabinet Office minister Nick Thomas-Symonds talked about that these whose brothers or sisters had been contaminated with most likely deadly viruses whereas receiving care must be fairly compensated.

He moreover launched in a written ministerial statement that the federal authorities “accepts in full or accepts in principle” all of the 12 solutions made as part of the Infected Blood Inquiry.

More than 30,000 of us acquired contaminated blood, or contaminated blood merchandise, between the Nineteen Seventies and early Nineties whereas current course of NHS care.

Some 3,000 of us died consequently and survivors reside with lifelong effectively being implications.

Last week, the federal authorities launched that 10 of us have been supplied compensation totalling better than £13m.

Keir Starmer has launched £35m in emergency assist for Ukraine to help it restore its vitality grid.

In an announcement launched as Starmer was attending the Joint Expeditionary Force (JEF) chief’s summit in Estonia, Downing Street moreover unveiled modern sanctions in opposition to the “shadow fleet” of oil tankers utilized by Russia to advertise its oil. No 10 talked about:

The UK has supplied £35m of emergency assist to help Ukraine restore its vitality grid and assist most likely probably the most weak by way of a third winter of battle, the prime minister has launched for the time being.

It comes as a result of the UK moreover reinforces its iron-clad assist for Ukraine by launching modern sanctions specializing in Russia’s vitality sector. Today’s sanctions purpose 20 shadow fleet ships carrying illicit Russian oil, along with Ocean Faye, Andaman Skies and Mianzimu, which have each carried better than 4 million barrels of Russian oil in 2024.

Key lynchpins in enabling the shopping for and promoting of Putin’s treasured oil, 2Rivers DMCC and 2Rivers PTE LTD have moreover been slapped with sanctions. These new measures will extra drain Putin’s battle chest, by clamping down on the oil revenues he so desperately should gasoline his illegal battle and put those who enable Russia’s oil exports on uncover.

And Starmer talked about:

As Putin’s oil revenues proceed to gasoline the fires of his illegal battle, Ukrainian households are enduring chilly, darkish nights, normally with out heating, light or electrical power, centered by Russia’s relentless missile assaults.

But these systematic assaults on Ukraine’s infrastructure received’t grind Ukraine down. It will solely deepen our resolve and assist.

Margaret Hodge, the earlier Labour minister and former chair of the Commons public accounts committee, stood down as an MP on the election. But it seems to be like as if she has on no account been busier. Now throughout the House of Lords, last week she was appointed as the government’s anti-corruption champion. And for the time being Lisa Nandy, the custom secretary, has launched that Hodge will lead an neutral overview into Arts Council England. In a Commons written statement, Nandy says:

This authorities will probably be sure that the humanities and custom won’t be the shield of a privileged few. We could even place arts and custom on the coronary coronary heart of our plan for change to ship progress and break down the restrictions to different all through the nation. This overview will probably be sure that Arts Council England is best positioned to help ship this and effectively steward our cultural and creative sectors in every part of England, serving to to rebuild Britain​ in a decade of nationwide renewal.

Police forces in England and Wales will acquire an precise phrases funding improve of three.5% in 2025-26, the Home Office has launched. PA Media opinions:

In a written statement, Diana Johnson, the policing minister, talked about the 2025-26 settlement will amount to £17.4bn, an increase of as a lot as £986.9m on the current yr.

The further funding will cowl the costs of the pay rises given to officers, the rise in employers’ nationwide insurance coverage protection contributions (NICs) and as well as pay for recruitment to help meet the federal authorities’s neighbourhood policing ensures.

The complete amount going into policing, along with the money to forces along with “wider system funding” will most likely be £19.5bn, a £1bn improve, representing an whole 3% precise phrases rise.

And Johnson talked about:

Of the £986.9m of additional funding for police forces, I can confirm that £657.1m of this can be a rise to authorities grants, which includes a rise throughout the core grants of £339m to ensure police forces are completely outfitted to ship our safer streets mission.

This moreover consists of £230.3m to compensate territorial forces for the costs of the change to the employer nationwide insurance coverage protection contributions from 2025-26, and an additional £100m to kickstart the first part of 13,000 further legislation enforcement officers, PCSOs and specific constables into neighbourhood policing roles. This will current policing with the funding required to type out crime and keep communities protected.

The Chinese embassy throughout the UK has instructed British MPs to “immediately stop creating trouble” and “stop anti-China political manipulations”.

In a statement released this morning on its website, in response to Yang Tengbo being named yesterday as a result of the alleged Chinese “spy” who befriended Prince Andrew, an embassy spokesperson that “anti-China clamours made by a handful of UK MPs” had “revealed their twisted mentality towards China”. The spokesperson accused them of trying to “smear China” and “undermine normal personnel exchanges between China and the UK”.

Here is the assertion.

As for the anti-China clamours made by a handful of UK MPs, they’ve carried out nothing nevertheless completely revealed their twisted mentality in course of China, along with their vainness and shamelessness. This is a typical case of a thief crying “catch thief”. What they’re truly as a lot as is to smear China, purpose in opposition to the Chinese group throughout the UK and undermine common personnel exchanges between China and the UK. We strongly condemn this.

I’ve to degree out that the CPC [Chinese Communist Party] and the Chinese authorities uphold that worldwide places must pursue friendship and cooperation on the thought of mutual respect for each other’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, non-interference in each other’s interior affairs, equality and mutual revenue. This is what now now we have been saying and what now now we have been doing. This will also be why China has so many buddies world large …

We urge the UK aspect to immediately stop creating trouble, stop anti-China political manipulations, and stop undermining common personnel exchanges between China and the UK.

In the Commons yesterday Iain Duncan Smith, the earlier Conservative chief, was notably essential of the United Front Work Department, a Chinese intelligence gathering unit. Duncan Smith talked about: “The intelligence and security committee report last year said [the UFWD] had penetrated ‘every sector’ of the UK economy, including by spying, stealing intellectual property, influencing, and shaping our institutions.”

But in for the time being’s assertion the embassy spokesperson defended the UFWD. The spokesperson talked about.

I moreover have to reiterate that theUnited Front led by the CPC endeavours to ship collectively diverse political occasions and people from all walks of life, ethnic groups and organisations to promote cooperation between the CPC and individuals who discover themselves not members of it and promote people-to-people exchanges and friendship with completely different worldwide places. This is above-board and previous reproach. Though some UK politicians tried to demonise China’s United Front work, they’re doomed to fail.

We on a regular basis think about {{that a}} sound and regular China-UK relationship is simply not a one-sided favour nevertheless what meets the frequent pursuits of every facet. The UK aspect might want to have a correct notion of China, see the historic sample clearly, and take care of its relations with China on the thought of mutual respect, non-interference in each other’s interior affairs, equality and mutual revenue.

Humza Yousaf, the earlier Scottish first minister, has launched that he’ll stand down as an MSP on the following Holyrood election, in 2026.

In a letter to current first minister John Swinney, Yousaf talked about he’ll most likely be campaigning arduous for the SNP on the following election nevertheless received’t run himself. He talked about:

Come 2026, I’ll have served 15 years as an MSP, 12 of those years as a minister throughout the Scottish authorities.

The subsequent Scottish parliament elections in 2026 can be the correct time for me to maneuver on, to produce an opportunity for the following know-how of MSPs to step forward, and to find the place I can best make a contribution in the end in serving to to type out quite a few probably the most pressing challenges our world faces.

Yousaf talked about that he hoped his time as first minister had been an inspiration to others.

It is normally talked about that you just simply can’t be what you possibly can’t see. I hope by by turning into the first first minister of colour, and first Muslim chief of a Western democratic nation, I’ve despatched a clear message to every youthful particular person, of any background, who aspires to grow to be concerned in public service, that you just simply do belong and are merely as deserving of different as all individuals else.

And he talked about that, although he had made errors, he felt he had on a regular basis dealt with of us with respect.

When one chapter begins to close, you normally spend time reflecting in your achievements, errors and even regrets – I’ve all three. However, I hope that every one by means of all of it, I was able to take care of of us with kindness, courtesy and respect.

He has posted the full letter on social media.

In a response, Swinney talked about:

I’m sorry to see @HumzaYousaf stepping down @ScotParl. He has been a pioneer in Scottish politics. I price all he has contributed to @scotgov and @theSNP and stay up for his continued involvement. I need Humza, Nadia and their family lots peace collectively

Good morning. The children’s wellbeing and schools bill is being revealed for the time being and, as Sally Weale opinions, it might set out plans to tighten checks on children being educated at residence in England.

Publication coincides with the sentencing of the killers of 10-year-old Sara Sharif – her father and step-mother – following a trial that uncovered particulars of one of many stunning circumstances of child cruelty heard by a British courtroom docket in years. Sara was taken out of school, and educated at residence throughout the months sooner than her lack of life, regardless that lecturers had started to notice proof that she was being assaulted at residence, and so the legal guidelines – although deliberate correctly sooner than the trial – does take care of one amongst safeguarding loopholes the Sharif case has highlighted.

Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, has been giving interviews this morning. She instructed the Today programme:

Too many children have been failed by the state currently, it’s clear that movement is required. So no further courses found, no further phrases. Today we set out our plans to ensure that these firms are working collectively and that now now we have lots higher visibility of the place children are and what they’re experiencing of their lives.

But in interviews Phillipson has moreover talked about the federal authorities doesn’t plan to legislate to ban smacking children in England – regardless that it’s banned in Scotland and Wales, and regardless that the federal authorities indicated throughout the autumn a rethink was on the taking part in playing cards.

In 2022, as opposition chief, Keir Starmer talked about he want to see the ban extended to England. In October, after the Sara Sharif muder trial opened, Dame Rachel de Souza, the children’s commissioner, said that “a ban on smacking is a necessary step to keep children safe and to stop lower level violence from escalating” and on the time the Department for Education said: “We are looking closely at the legal changes made in Wales and Scotland as we consider whether there is any more we could do in this area.” Last week, after the verdicts had been delivered throughout the Sharif trial, de Souza said:

What haunts me most likely probably the most about Sara’s lack of life is that her father used the phrases ‘I legally punished my child’, believing this to be a defence to murder. It is unthinkable that any father or mom or carer could disguise behind our licensed system to justify such cruelty – and however, children residing in England for the time being have a lot much less security from assault than adults.

Yet for the time being Phillipson has talked about that the federal authorities nonetheless has “no plans” to behave on this. She instructed LBC:

We’re not needing to legislate spherical this. I do want to take a look on the experience in Wales and Scotland the place they’ve legislated to know what the influence has been.

And, requested why the federal authorities is simply not implementing a ban in England, she instructed Times Radio:

Because what I have to understand is the have an effect on and the influence of the legal guidelines in Wales. They will most likely be setting out the first spherical of a overview into the implications and influence of the legal guidelines that that they’d launched. I want to see that, want to understand it, and to resolve then whether or not or not it’s important to take extra measures proper right here in England.

Here is the agenda for the day.

Morning: Keir Starmer has been having a breakfast meeting with enterprise leaders in Estonia. Later he’s attending the Joint Expeditionary Force summit, after which visiting British forces near the border with Russia.

9.30am: The Post Office Horizon scandal inquiry hears closing statements from counsel representing the Post Office, Paula Vennells, Fujitsu, Gareth Jenkins, and the Department for Business and Trade.

10.30am: Charles Clarke, the earlier Labour residence secretary, and Michael Gove, the earlier Conservative justice secretary, give proof on prisons to the Lords justice and residential affairs committee.

11.30am: Downing Street holds a lobby briefing.

11.30am: Ed Miliband, the vitality secretary, takes questions throughout the Commons.

Early afternoon (most likely): The Home Office publishes a written ministerial assertion with particulars of funding for police forces in England and Wales in 2025-26.

2.30pm: Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, offers proof to the Commons residence affairs committee (which for a couple of years she used to chair).

2.30pm: Shabana Mahmood, the justice secretary, offers proof to the Commons justice committee.

If it is advisable to contact me, please put up a message beneath the highway or message me on social media. I can’t be taught the entire messages BTL, nevertheless if you put “Andrew” in a message geared towards me, I’m further extra prone to see it because of I search for posts containing that phrase.

If it is advisable to flag one factor up urgently, it’s finest to utilize social media. You can attain me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn. The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X nevertheless specific individual Guardian journalists are there, I’ve nonetheless have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I’ll see it and reply if necessary.

I uncover it very helpful when readers degree out errors, even minor typos. No error is simply too small to applicable. And I uncover your questions very fascinating too. I can’t promise to reply to all of them, nevertheless I’ll try to reply to as many as I can, each BTL or usually throughout the weblog.